Mike Belcher posted a series of tweets on August 27, 2025, discussing topics related to the severability of issues, historical perspectives on errors, and the interpretation of “wizardry” in relation to God’s Law.
In his first tweet at 14:11 UTC, Belcher wrote, “Absolutely do both, but they are, in fact, severable.”
Later that day at 14:27 UTC, he stated, “Doesn’t care to actually address the heart of the matter. Details that, at best, the error has a longer historic record.”
In a subsequent tweet at 14:46 UTC, Belcher offered commentary on religious and philosophical concepts: ‘”Wizardry” is historically understood as spellcasting that moves one away from God’s Law – as in Eve being deceived toward believing God might be wrong in his pronouncement re: fruit. The special gnosticism of “Natural Law,” whether that be SCSR, Thomism-proper, or Aristotelian’.
Belcher’s comments reference theological debates over natural law traditions such as Scholasticism (SCSR), Thomism (from Thomas Aquinas), and Aristotelian philosophy. These traditions have long influenced Christian ethical thought by interpreting moral principles through reason and natural order rather than direct revelation alone. The use of terms like “gnosticism” signals ongoing discussions within religious scholarship about the role of esoteric knowledge versus established doctrine.
