Mike Belcher, a public figure active in legislative matters, recently posted a series of tweets outlining his views on recent events and legislative initiatives.
On September 14, 2025, Belcher commented on an unspecified incident by stating, “This is, perhaps, worse than merely celebrating his murder. This takes Charlie’s name in vain.”
The following day, September 15, 2025, he detailed several pieces of legislation submitted for consideration: “Legislation submitted today:
-upgraded NH-made firearm/accessory federal regulation exemption bill (aiming at Commerce Clause)
-reintroduction of death penalty for child rape and murder
-PRC (CCP) national real property ownership prohibition
-PRC (CCP) national NH college ban” These proposals reference exemptions from federal regulations for New Hampshire-made firearms and accessories by challenging the Commerce Clause’s application; reintroducing capital punishment for specific crimes; and restricting certain property ownership and educational opportunities for nationals of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), specifically referencing the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Later that same day, Belcher hinted at further developments: “There has been an additional and very special legislative filing relevant to current events. Be on the lookout for details to be released tomorrow. It’s time to take back our country.”
Belcher’s references to proposed restrictions involving PRC nationals align with broader debates over foreign ownership of U.S. real estate and participation in American higher education institutions. In recent years, several states have considered or enacted measures targeting land purchases by individuals or entities linked to foreign governments deemed adversarial by U.S. authorities.
His mention of challenging federal oversight through state-level exemptions also reflects ongoing disputes between states’ rights advocates and proponents of stronger federal regulatory authority under the Commerce Clause.
